🏆Global Airdrop Leaderboard

See how rankings work, how points are calculated, and how users are positioned during events and campaigns.

🏆 Global Leaderboard

The main leaderboard ranks users based on the total amount of WIN Points they have claimed across missions and events.

• Rankings update dynamically as points are claimed

• All claimed WIN Points contribute to the overall position

• The leaderboard is visible to participants

The leaderboard reflects activity and participation over time. Positions may change as new points are added or verified.

⭐ Initial WIN Points for Existing Users

Some users may receive an initial allocation of WIN Points based on prior activity on the platform.

These points:

• Are granted one time only

• Are independent from Event 1 & Event 2 missions

• Do not require mission completion

• Are based on historical participation before the event structure was introduced

📊 Event-Based Rankings

In some cases, WIN may introduce event-specific leaderboards that track performance within a particular event. These would run alongside the global leaderboard and would be communicated separately if activated

🎁 Global Airdrop Leaderboard Reward Distribution

At the end of the event period, WIN may distribute rewards among participants based on their final leaderboard position.

If a reward distribution takes place, the tentative allocation would follow this structure:

Ranking Position	% of Total Reward Pool
1st	30.3%
2nd	15%
3rd	10%
4th–10th	3% each
11th–30th	0.8% each
31st–100th	0.11% each

This distribution is indicative and subject to change. WIN reserves the right to adjust the reward structure, pool size, eligibility criteria, and distribution timeline at its discretion.

Reward format, token type, and delivery method will be communicated before distribution takes place.

🔍 Transparency & Adjustments

Leaderboards are designed to provide a clear and simple view of participation and activity.

To maintain fairness and system integrity:

• Rankings may be adjusted following verification processes

• Points may be reviewed in cases of abnormal activity or technical inconsistencies

• Integrity and anti-abuse checks may affect positioning

Visible rankings are informational and may evolve as validations are completed.